Seleccionar página

SOCIETAL IMPACT IN EU-FUNDED RESEARCH

Societal impact, from design to uptake

Horizon Europe distinguishes three categories of impact: scientific, societal, and technological or economic. We work on the societal one, and on the communication, dissemination and exploitation function that serves all three. In a technology-led project, that is the part we cover.

We do this from the concept stage through to implementation, as a beneficiary partner leading work packages or as an independent consultant working alongside the coordinator.

;

WHERE SOCIETAL IMPACT IS LOST

3 situations we are usually called in to resolve

i

A societal pathway that is asserted rather than argued.

The expected outcomes of the topic are restated rather than translated into specific, measurable contributions attributable to this project. Social and behavioural assumptions are left implicit, and the evaluator has no way of judging whether they hold.

}

A plan produced too late.

The dissemination, exploitation and communication plan is due as a deliverable six months after signature. Prepared under time pressure, it becomes a compliance document with little relation to the results the project is generating, and difficult to report against.

Results that never reach the people who could act on them.

Deposited in a repository and presented at a conference, but never delivered to the practitioners, public authorities or communities in a position to use them.

HOW WE WORK

Four stages, one continuous thread

FIRST STAGE

BEFORE SUBMISSION

01 · DESIGN

The societal pathway: outcomes, target groups, barriers and KPIs. Before the work packages are fixed.

02 · PROVE

The societal argument in section 2.1 and the full CDE plan in section 2.2, written to the evaluation form.

SECOND STAGE

ONCE PROJECT RUNNING

03 · DELIVER

The specialised work packages and tasks we lead during implementation: SSH research, gender analysis, engagement, policy work, and the CDE plan and its execution.

04 · UPTAKE

Policy uptake and knowledge transfer, usually as a task in the final work package and for as long as the obligations run.

Four competences, one category of impact

Social sciences and humanities.

Adoption is a social question before it is a technical one. Under SSH-flagged topics, approximately one partner in five is an SSH partner, and insufficient integration is reflected in a lower evaluation score.

Evidence-based policy making.

For most societal challenges the route to impact runs through a regulation, a guideline or a professional standard of practice rather than through a market. That route has to be identified early and argued in the proposal.

Gender and sex analysis.

The gender dimension in research and innovation content is assessed under the Excellence criterion, as part of the methodology. It is distinct from gender balance within the team, and evaluators assess it as such.

Communication, dissemination and exploitation.

Article 17 of the Grant Agreement requires activities that are effective, proportionate, strategic and coherent, and states that ad hoc efforts are not sufficient. Non-compliance may lead to a reduction of the grant.

How we join, and where we stop

We work in two ways. As a beneficiary partner in the consortium, with our own budget and deliverables, leading work packages on SSH, societal impact, engagement or communication, or contributing specialised tasks within work packages led by others. Or as an independent consultant working alongside the coordinator without joining the consortium. Both are routine for us, and which one fits depends on the call and on the stage you have reached.

We do not cover the technological or economic pathway: market analysis, business models, standardisation and intellectual property are not ours, and where a result requires them we say so and work with whoever owns that part of the consortium. Research ethics, integrity and data protection are likewise outside our remit. Naming the boundary is quicker for everyone than discovering it in the
second meeting.

What the numbers stand for

Track Record

EU-Funded Projects since 2016

Partner Institutions in our Research Network

Peer-Reviewed Publications

Working towards a deadline

Send us the topic and your draft concept. We will come back with an assessment of where the societal
impact risk lies and what we would do about it. There is no cost and no obligation to work with us
afterwards.